tpo25综合写作范文

管理学点击： 2016-11-28

tpo25综合写作范文篇一

托福综合写作例文解析TPO 25

智课网TOEFL备考资料

托福综合写作例文解析TPO 25

摘要：托福综合写作例文解析TPO 25，同学们，如果你觉得你对托福写作考试没有什么把握，尤其是综合写作部分，感觉不知道如何下手，不知所措，那么或许如下的托福综合写作例文解析能够给你以启示。

如下就是小编为各位同学归纳整理的托福综合写作例文解析，这则资料非常受广大同学们的欢迎，下载量很高，希望同学们充分利用，并能为大家带来实质性的帮助。

本文只提供托福综合写作的范文。

例文(仅供参考)

In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers

demonstrated that they can produce a small electric current when filled with some liquids. However, it is not likely that the vessels were actually used as electric batteries in ancient times.

First of all, if the vessels were used as batteries, they would probably have been attached to some electricity

conductors such as metal wires. But there is no evidence that any metal wires were located near the vessels. All that has been excavated are the vessels themselves.

Second, the copper cylinders inside the jars look exactly like copper cylinders discovered in the ruins of Seleucia, an ancient city located nearby. We know that the copper cylinders from Seleucia were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, not for generating electricity. Since the cylinders found with the jars have the same shape, it is very likely they were used for holding scrolls as well. That no scrolls were found inside the jars can be explained by the fact that the scrolls simply disintegrated over the centuries.

Finally, what could ancient people have done with the electricity that the vessels were supposed to have generated? They had no devices that replied on electricity. As batteries, the vessels would have been completely useless to them.

tpo25综合写作范文篇二

综合写作25-34文本(附解析)

综合写作TPO25

阅读材料：

In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The archaeologist proposed that vessel were ancient electric batteries and even demonstrated that they can produce a small electric current when filled with some liquids. However, it is not likely that the vessels were actually used as electric batteries in ancient times.

First of all, if the vessels were used as batteries, they would probably have been attached to some electricity conductors such as metal wires. But there is no evidence that any metal wires were located near the vessels. All that has been excavated are the vessels themselves.

阅读段观点：

考古学家发现的2200年的容器不太可能在当时被当做电池使用。

1. 容器上面并没有附带金属丝等导体。

2. 容器中发现了的copper cylinders，而这是用来存放卷轴的，而并非是用来发电的。

3. 古人并没有对于电池和电的需求。

听力材料：

Your reading says that these vessels were not used as batteries in ancient times, but the arguments used in the reading are not convincing. The battery explanation could very well be correct.

First, about the absence of wires or other conductors, Remember, vessels were discovered by local people, not archaeologists. These people might have found other material located near the jars. But since they were not trained archaeologists, they may not have recognized the importance of that material. So materials serving as wires or conductors might have been overlooked as uninteresting or even thrown away. We’ll never know.

Second, it is true that the copper cylinders in the vessels are similar to cylinders used to hold scrolls, but that does not really prove anything. It’s possible that the copper cylinders were originally designed to preserve scrolls. And that some ancient inventor later discovered that if you use them together with iron rods and some liquid in a clay vessel, they will produce electricity. That’s how the first ancient battery could have been born. In other words, the copper cylinders could have been originally used for one purpose, but then adapted for another purpose.

Finally, there’s the question of the possible uses of the battery in the ancient world. Well, the battery could produce a mild shock or tingling sensation when someone touched it. This could very well have been interpreted as evidence of some invisible power. You can easily see how people could convince others that they had magical powers through the use of the battery. Also, the battery could have been used for healing. Modern medicine uses mild electric current to stimulate muscles and relieve aches and pains. Ancient doctors may have used the batteries for the same purpose. 听力段反驳：

阅读段观点没有说服力，这些容器很可能是古代的电池。

1. 发现容器的是非专业的当地人，而并非考古学家，他们可能意识不到金属导线的重要性，所以可能将这些导线丢弃。

2. copper cylinders是用来存放卷轴的没错，但是在里面放入金属棒和液体，他也可以用来发电。

3. 在古代人们有充分的理由去使用电池，而且电池还可以被用于治疗。

综合写作TPO26

阅读材料：

The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a serious threat to freshwater fish populations in all of North America.

First, the history of the zebra mussel’s spread suggests that the invasion might be unstoppable. It is a prime example of an invasion made possible by human transportation. From the zebra mussel，s original habitats in Eastern Europe, ships helped spread it out along new canals built to connect Europe’s waterways. The mussel can attach itself to a ship’ s bottom or can survive in the water—called "ballast water"—that the ship needs to take on to properly balance its cargo. By the early nineteenth century, the mussel had spread to the whole of Europe. It was later carried to the east coast of North America in the ballast water of ships traveling from Europe. The way ships have spread the zebra mussel in the past strongly suggests that the species will soon colonize all of North America.{tpo25综合写作范文}.

Moreover, once zebra mussels are carried to a new habitat, they can dominate it. They are a hardy species that does well under a variety of conditions, and they have a high rate of reproduction. Most important, however, zebra mussels often have no predators in their new habitats, and species without natural predators are likely to dominate their habitats.

Finally, zebra mussels are likely to cause a decline in the overall fish population in habitats where they become dominant. The mussels are plankton eaters, which means that they compete for food with many freshwater fish species.

阅读段观点：

zebra mussel将会入侵北美，对当地的淡水鱼群造成严重威胁。这种入侵是不可避免的。

1. 人们的运输将zebra mussel带到世界各地，所以历史表明这种入侵时不可避免的。

2. zebra mussel有着很高的繁殖率，并且没有天敌。所以没到达一个新的栖息地，它们都会很快的控制那里。

3. zebra mussel会和当地淡水鱼抢食物，从而导致淡水鱼数量的下降。{tpo25综合写作范文}.

听力材料：

Contrary to what you just read, there are ways to control the zebra mussel's spread. What's more, it is not so clear that the mussel is a serious threat to fish populations. True, the spread of zebra mussels couldn't be controlled in the past, but that's because people didn't have enough knowledge. In fact, there are effective ways to stop ships from carrying the mussels to new locations. Here's an example. The way zebra mussels usually travel across the ocean is that a ship takes on some fresh "ballast water" in Europe and then empties that water into American waterways when it arrives. Full of zebra mussels, but the ship can be required to empty out the freshwater and refill with ocean water while still out in the ocean. Salt water will kill the mussels.

Second, it's true that zebra mussels often don't have predators in their new habitats, but that's only in the beginning. What's been happening in Europe is that local aquatic birds sooner or later notice there's a new food source around and change their habits to exploit it. They switch from whatever they were eating before to eating zebra mussels. And birds can eat a lot of mussels. So zebra mussels aren't so likely to dominate their new habitats after all.

Finally, even in habitats where zebra mussels become dominant, is the overall fish population likely to decrease. It's true that zebra mussels may have a negative impact on fish that eat plankton. But on other fish, they can have a positive impact. For example, the mussels generate nutrients that are eaten by fish that feed near the bottom of the lake or river. So bottom-feeding fish populations may increase, even if plankton-eating fish population decrease.

听力段反驳：

zebra mussel的入侵时可以被控制的，而且也不一定会对鱼群带来严重威胁。

1. 过去的人们不懂如何去控制zebra mussel。盐水就可以杀死zebra mussel。

2. zebra mussel在刚刚到达新的栖息地的时候不会有天敌，但是之后有些动物也会把它们当成食物。

3. zebra mussel会和一部分鱼抢食物导致他们数量下降，但是zebra mussel对其他鱼类有着积极的影响。

综合写作TPO27

阅读材料：

The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientist have long wondered what caused the Little Ice Age. Several possible causes have been proposed.

First, the cooling may have been caused by disrupting of ocean currents. Before the Little Ice Age, there was a period of unusually warm weather during which glaciers melted. These melted glaciers sent a large amount of cold freshwater into the Gulf Stream, a large ocean current that strongly affects Earth's climate. Some scientists believe that this freshwater was enough to temporarily disrupt the Gulf Stream. Such a disruption could have caused the Little Ice Age.

Second, volcanic eruption could have caused the Little Ice Age. When volcanoes erupt, they send dark clouds of dust and sulfur gas into the atmosphere. These clouds, which can spread over great areas, block some sunlight from reaching Earth's surface. This can decrease the global temperatures. Scientists know of several volcanic eruptions that took place during the Little Ice Age.{tpo25综合写作范文}.

Third, substantial decreases in human populations may have contributed indirectly to the cooling of the climate. For a variety of reason(disease, warfare, social disruption), the human population just before the Little Ice Age and during the early part of it was lower than it had been in a long time. Forest trees started growing on fields that were no longer used for agriculture. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, they decrease the greenhouse effect that keeps Earth warm. With more forest trees carbon dioxide, earth became cooler.

阅读段观点：

科学家提出了几个引起可能引起小冰河时期的原因。

1. 冰川融合后的淡水截断洋流，导致小冰河时期。

2. 火山爆发后的火山灰挡住阳光，导致小冰河时期的形成。

3. 人口减少导致导致农业衰退与大量野生树木的生长，树木大量吸收温室气体，导致气温下降。

听力材料：

Unfortunately，the arguments of the reading passage are a little out of date． Scientists now have new information that shows that none of the ideas the reading passage discusses could account for the Little Ice Age．

First，about the Gulf Stream．Scientists now know that disrupting the Gulf Stream would cause cooling only in Europe and North America，but the Little Ice Age also affected the Southern hemisphere，in places like New Zealand and Southern Africa for example．Since the disruption of the Gulf Stream cannot explain why these southern areas became colder，it cannot explain the Little Ice Age．

Second, the volcanoes theory．It’s true that if volcanic eruptions put enough dust into the atmosphere．the result can be a cooler climate．But large amounts of volcanic dust in the atmosphere would have also produced striking visual effect that people would have noticed at the time．For example．Dramatically colorful Sunsets or snow being grey or brown instead of white．But there are almost no reports of anything like that routinely happening during the Little Ice Age．So it seems that the volcanic eruptions during that period were simply not strong enough to release the large amounts of dust needed to lower global temperatures．

Third, about forests on farmland stopping the warming greenhouse effect by removing carbon dioxide．There just was not enough time for this effect to work．The human population grew back to previous levels fairly quickly，which meant that forests were soon being cut down again to clear fields for the crops needed to feed the growing population．As a result，we know that the forests mentioned in the reading passage were not there long enough to cause the long—term global cooling of the climate．听力段反驳：

阅读段的观点过时了，无法解释小冰河时期的成因。

1. 洋流被阻断只会影响欧洲以及北美，而小冰河时期影响的却是南半球。

2. 大量的火山灰会引起人们可以注意到的视觉效果，但是在小冰河时期却没有相关的记录。

3. 人口增长速度迅速，树木没有足够的时间去吸收温室气体导致气温下降。

综合写作TPO28

阅读材料：

Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made his into an international celebrity. Though some historians have expressed doubts that Peary did in fact reach the North Pole, three arguments provide strong support for the truth of Peary’s claim.

tpo25综合写作范文篇三

托福TPO25综合写作内容解读

智课网TOEFL备考资料

托福TPO25综合写作内容解读

摘要：有关托福TPO综合写作和独立写作的内容我们已经为大家介绍了不少，已经接近了尾声，不知道大家复习的怎么样了？今天我们陆续为大家爱介绍接下来的三篇文章：托福写作综合写作TPO23-25，需要的考生抓紧时间下载啦！{tpo25综合写作范文}.

托福 TPO25综合写作阅读材料：

In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers

constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The archaeologist proposed that vessel were ancient electric batteries and even demonstrated that they can produce a small electric current when filled with some liquids. However, it is not likely that the vessels were actually used as electric batteries in ancient times.

First of all, if the vessels were used as batteries, they would probably have been attached to some electricity

conductors such as metal wires. But there is no evidence that any metal wires were located near the vessels. All that has been excavated are the vessels themselves.

That no scrolls were found inside the jars can be explained by the fact that the scrolls simply disintegrated over the centuries.

托福TPO25综合写作听力材料

You reading says that these vessels were not used as batteries in ancient times, but the arguments used in the reading are not convincing. The battery explanation could very well be correct.

First, about the absence of wires or other conductors. Remember, vessels were discovered by local people, not archaeologist. There people might have found other material located near the jars. But since they were not trained archaeologists, they many not have recognized the importance of that material. So materials serving as wires or conductors might have been overlooked as uninteresting or even thrown away. We'll never know.

Second, it is true that the copper cylinders in the vessels are similar to the cylinders used to hold scrolls, but that does nor really prove anything. It's possible that the copper cylinders were originally designed to preserve scrolls. And that some ancient inventor later discovered that if you use them together with iron rods and some liquid in a clay vessel, they will produce electricity.That's how the first ancient battery could have been born. In other words, the copper cylinders could have been originally used for one purpose, but then adapted for another purpose.{tpo25综合写作范文}.

Finally, there's the question of the possible uses the battery in the ancient world. Well the battery could produce a mild shock or tingling sensation when someone touched it. This could very well have been interpreted as evidence of some invisible power. You can easily see how people could convince others that they had magical power through the use of the battery. Also the battery could have been used for healing. Modern medicine used mild eletric current to stimulate mussels and relieve aches and pains. Ancient doctors may have used the batteries for the same purpose.

托福TPO25综合写作例文(仅供参考)

The reading passage explores the function of ancient vessels, and the professor's lecture is also about the same topic. Whereas, she contends that the arguments in reading are not convincing and the vessels could be utilized as battery in old ages, which conflict with reading's content. And in the speech, the professor uses three compelling reasons to support her position.

First, the absence of metal wire mentioned in reading cannot be tenable proof. In the lecture, the professor claims that the vessels were discovered by local villagers, not archaeologists, when they excavated those ancient products, they had no awareness of careful observations. Therefore, those wires might be neglected and threw away, which

means electric wires are supposed to exist before the discovery even though they were not found after experts came to the fields, which disproves its counterpart in reading passages.

Second, even though it is true that the copper cylinders are look similar like Seleucia's, the professor asserts that it cannot be the evidence to identify the function of those later vessels. The early vessels might be served as book scrolls at the beginning, but later some inventors realized the addition of iron and liquid can produce electricity, which means the original function was adopted by later generation, and this part is obviously overlooked by reading passage.

Third, the professor states that electricity could be useful for ancestors which weakens the argument made in reading. She points out that ancient people can use battery to prove the magic invisible power. The electric battery can produce slight current which could cause mind shock after people touched. Moreover, it can be the healing tool as well. When people feel painful, the shock of battery could release the feeling of ache.

To sum up, the professor clearly pinpoints the weaknesses in the reading passages, and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading, i.e., the function of vessel is not as electric battery, is specious.

以上就是为大家介绍的托福综合写作TPO25的内容，托福写作成绩不高的学生一定要吃透这些内容，托福tpo里面包含的托福写作类型设计了真题中考到了几乎所有的类型，是我们托福写作最佳资料。老话重提，你可以通过扫描页面中的二维码。加入我们的小马 21天免费体验班，对于你备考中出现的各种问题，他们都会为你第一时间解答，能够有效的帮助你提高自己的托福写作成绩。

tpo25综合写作范文篇四

TPO20综合写作范文

The reading passage explores the topic of the “Let it burn” policy. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the “Let it burn” policy is fundamental positive policy, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.

First, the professor argues in the lecture that the fire enhanced the diversity of vegetation in Yellowstone Park, even though the reading passage suggests that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. This is because that the fire has created a opportunity for some new plants to grow, for instance, the small plants which needed open un-shaded area and the seeds which demanded high levels of heat to germinate, which means that the small vegetations would had a better environment after the large trees had been destroyed. Obviously, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.

Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the park wildlife was affected, and there was also concern that the destruction of habitats and food chains, the professor states that the fire also created new opportunities for some animals’ thriving that the population could recover and strengthened certain food chains. Then he supports this point with the fact that, for example, the new plants offered perfect habitats for some animals like rabbits and hares, and promote their predators’ booming the

survived animals would be stronger after fire.

Finally, the professor asserts that the fire did not influence tourism negatively since it would not happen every year, whereas the author of the reading claim that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that it was very unusual combination of several factors, such as low rainfall, strong winds and accumulation of dry undergrowth, that caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988 , and visitors came back to park next year and each year after that.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading about that the fire is a disaster for Yellowstone is incorrect.

tpo25综合写作范文篇五

TPO 25 综合写作

In the reading,the author claims that the vessels found in Iraq were not electric batteries for three reasons.However,the professor in the listening thinks all these three reasons are not convincing and it is likely that the explanation of vessels is correct.

First,the reading suggests that no metal wires which electric conductivity is needed are found around the vessels.So,it is less possible that vessels were used as batteries.Yet,the professor argues that archaeologist did not find metal wires did not mean they are not existed.The vessels were discovered by the local people.Since they were not professional,it is likely that they truly had found the metal wires but ignored the importance of it and simply threw it away.

Second,the copper cylinders in vessels are similar to copper cylinders which were used to hold scrolls.But the professor refutes that the original design of copper cylinders in vessels might have been used for store scrolls.Later,the ancient investors discovered that the vessels were able to produce electricity when added rock rods and liquid into it.It is how the first battery had been born.It is rational that the vessels were designed for one propose and then alter to another propose.

Third,the reading thinks that batteries can be applied to no devices in the time when vessels were made.However,the professor argues that people can produce electricity to shock people when they touch it,therefore it could have been interpreted as invisible power.People could adopt electricity to convinced others of their magic.Also,battery could have been use in healing.For example,the ancient doctor could take the advantage of electricity to stimulate muscles and relieve pains.

tpo25综合写作范文篇六

托福 tpo26 综合写作范文

In terms whether the zebra mussel will exert negative influence on North American, the passage and lecture are contradictory to each other. The author believes that zebra mussel might do harm the local species as they arrived while the lecturer holds a different opinion.

First of all, the author makes a point that the history events suggest the zebra mussel's invasion is unstoppable. In the past, human transportation makes it possible for zebra mussel spread around the whole Europe and it is likely to happen again in North American. However, the lecturer demonstrates a different idea that a change made in the "ballast water" will prevent the invasion of zebra mussel from continuing. He says that if we refill the "ballast water" with ocean water, the mussel will no longer survive because the saline water might probably kill them all.

Second, contrary to the belief in the passage that zebra mussel is able to conquer the new habitat due to their high reproduction rates and adaptation ability, as well as lacking predator, the lecturer says that the hypothesis made by author is not true. He mentions that there are many local bird will eat the zebra mussel as a major prey. As a result, the zebra mussel is unlikely to dominate the new habitat.

Finally, regarding whether the zebra mussel will cause the decline in the fish population since they may compete for food such as plankton with fish species. The author thinks it is a possible consequence brought by zebra mussel. However, the lecturer refutes it that the mussel can't reduce the fish population because they provide enough nutrient for bottom living fish.

tpo25综合写作范文

tpo25综合写作范文篇一

tpo25综合写作范文篇二

tpo25综合写作范文篇三

tpo25综合写作范文篇四

tpo25综合写作范文篇五

tpo25综合写作范文篇六

tpo25独立写作范文

tpo25综合写作翻译